AI’s wild take on rewilding

What happens when AI gets to define what that nature looks like? 
Katie Hill - Editor-in-Chief, My Green Pod
Blossoming cherry sakura tree on a green field with a blue sky and clouds.

A new study from the University of Aberdeen has revealed that artificial intelligence may be shaping the future of rewilding in ways that create an idealised version of what restored nature can look like.

For the study, which is published in People & Nature by the British Ecological Society, researchers analysed AI‑generated images and descriptions of rewilding produced by chatbots and compared them with visual and textual materials used by UK rewilding advocacy organisations.

Idealised aesthetics

The findings show that both sources consistently favour familiar, idealised aesthetics: dramatic landscapes, charismatic wildlife and scenes notably free of people or the ‘messy’ ecological processes that underpin real ecosystems — including decay, disturbance and death.
 
The study warns that by repeatedly showcasing such selective imagery, rewilding organisations are inadvertently training AI systems to reproduce exclusionary visions of nature.

As AI tools become increasingly embedded in communications and public engagement, these biases risk being reinforced and widely disseminated, shaping how future audiences perceive rewilded landscapes.

However, the researchers emphasise that this trend can still be reversed.

Authentic rewilding

By incorporating a wider, more inclusive visual content — featuring diverse species, human presence and the full spectrum of ecological processes — organisations can help steer AI models toward more socially accurate and ecologically authentic representations of rewilding.

‘Our research highlights a pressing societal issue: conservation organisations are, often unintentionally, encoding incomplete visions of nature into the AI systems that will influence how the next generation imagines our environment in the future. It also demonstrates how social science methods can – and must – be used to critically interrogate AI‑generated content. 

‘This study marks one of the first examples of Human Geographers analysing GenAI‑produced visual materials and highlights the importance of ensuring that emerging technologies reflect inclusive, realistic, and equitable depictions of the natural world.’

DR FLURINA WARTMANN 
University of Aberdeen

Here's more related content

Join The Conversation

Leave a Reply

Here's More Ethical Home & Garden, News News & Features

  • All
  • AI
  • Africa
  • Amazon
  • Brazil
  • David Attenborough
  • EU
  • Europe
  • London
  • P.E.A. Awards
  • USA
  • activism
  • activists
  • animal welfare
  • animals
  • arts
  • awards
  • battery
  • bills
  • biodiversity
  • birds
  • business
  • butterflies
  • cats
  • celebrity
  • charity
  • climate
  • climate action
  • climate change
  • climate policy
  • climate solutions
  • community
  • computing
  • conflict
  • consciousness
  • conservation
  • cooking
  • deforestation
  • economics
  • economy
  • ecosystem services
  • education
  • energy
  • energy bills
  • environment
  • equality
  • events
  • family
  • farming
  • fashion
  • film
  • fires
  • food
  • food waste
  • forest
  • fossil fuels
  • garden
  • gardening
  • green space
  • habitat
  • habitats
  • health
  • holiday
  • home
  • human rights
  • indigenous
  • investment
  • just transition
  • kids
  • leadership
  • media
  • mining
  • nature
  • oceans
  • organic
  • pet food
  • pets
  • plastic pollution
  • policy
  • politics
  • rainforest
  • renewable energy
  • rewilding
  • rural
  • sharing
  • shools
  • solar
  • tech
  • tips
  • travel
  • trees
  • urban
  • waste
  • water
  • wildlife
0 Shares