Trade deal threatens animal welfare

Ministers must not abandon promises to ‘protect farmers from being undercut in trade deals’
Katie Hill - Editor-in-Chief, My Green Pod
Cattle awaiting slaughter in feedlot in West Texas.

Animal Policy International is warning that an imminent UK-US trade deal, that may be rushed through in response to Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’, poses a significant threat to the UK’s animal welfare standards and higher welfare British farmers.

While the government has emphasised it will maintain food safety regulations, it has not confirmed how it will also address the substantial animal welfare gap between UK and US production systems.

A dangerous loophole

Recent statements from government officials ahead of the US Administration’s announcements on tariffs appear to confirm that, while the UK will maintain its ban on hormone-treated beef and chlorine-washed chicken, it is ‘looking to compromise in other areas’, including ‘eliminating tariffs of up to 12% on US beef, chicken and pork.’

Based on reporting in The Times and Politico, it appears the government’s red lines are primarily focused on maintaining existing import bans, which would only cover SPS (Sanitary and Phytosanitary) standards.

However, this narrow focus risks the UK eliminating tariffs on products that violate domestic UK animal welfare laws.

This would create a dangerous loophole that would allow imports produced using practices that would be illegal for British farmers.

‘Focusing solely on food safety measures while ignoring animal welfare requirements widens an already dangerous loophole. British farmers who follow higher welfare standards mandated by UK law will be undermined by imports from production systems that would be illegal here.

‘This issue of the UK effectively having our feet held to the fire over trade highlights why we urgently need legislation to protect UK standards and prevent them being negotiated away in trade deals. It’s common sense: if it’s too cruel to produce in Britain, then, it’s too cruel to import into Britain.’

MANDY CARTER
Co-executive director of Animal Policy International

 

Differences in welfare standards

The regulatory gap between UK and US animal welfare standards is stark.

Sow stalls for pigs remain legal in 39 US states but have been banned in the UK since 1999.

Battery cages for hens have been banned in the UK since 2012; they are only prohibited in 11 US states.

Tail docking and castration on pigs are routinely performed without pain relief in the US.

US poultry are excluded from humane slaughter laws, with no federal requirement for stunning.
 
Antibiotic use in US farming is on average five times higher than in the UK, with up to 16 times higher in cattle farming.

‘In trade talks with the USA, the UK government must avoid repeating the mistakes of the UK-Australia trade agreement, which allowed lower animal welfare imports into the UK. This deal risks further opening the floodgates for the import of meat, eggs or dairy into the UK that may have been produced in systems that are banned here, such as the use of battery cages for laying hens and sow stalls for pigs.
 
‘It is unfair to British farmers to require them to meet certain welfare standards while allowing tariff-free access to lower welfare imports. This deal risks negatively impacting the UK’s current animal welfare standards for decades to come – undermining our farmers and hard-won animal welfare improvements, jeopardising our food security and outsourcing animal cruelty.

‘The public supports putting restrictions or bans on lower welfare imports that do not meet UK production standards. The government should be reflecting that in trade talks and requiring all imports to meet UK legal standards for animal welfare and positioning the UK as a champion of higher welfare farming.’

ANTHONY FIELD
Head of Compassion in World Farming UK

Public support for welfare standards

A recent survey shows 84% of British people – five out of six – support restricting or banning low welfare imports that don’t meet UK standards.

Animal Policy International says this overwhelming public sentiment should be reflected in trade policy and is calling on the government to introduce legislation ensuring all agricultural imports meet the same animal welfare standards required of British farmers, not just food safety requirements.

Here's more related content

Elephant washing on southern banks of the periyar river at Kodanad training center
News

Save the Asian elephants

On World Elephant Day (12 August), Duncan McNair, founder and CEO of Save The Asian Elephants, shares the urgent need to enact the Animals (Low-Welfare Activities Abroad) Act.

Read More »

Join The Conversation

Leave a Reply

Here's More Ethical Food & Drink, News News & Features

  • All
  • Africa
  • Earth Day
  • London
  • USA
  • acivists
  • activism
  • activists
  • animal welfare
  • animals
  • awards
  • banking
  • beaches
  • business
  • butterflies
  • circular economy
  • cities
  • climate
  • climate action
  • climate change
  • climate crisis
  • climate justice
  • coast
  • community
  • conflict
  • consumer
  • diet
  • economy
  • education
  • emissions
  • energy
  • environment
  • events
  • extreme weather
  • family
  • farming
  • farms
  • fashion
  • festival
  • flowers
  • food
  • forests
  • fossil fuels
  • garden
  • gender
  • green jobs
  • habitat
  • health
  • human rights
  • indigenous
  • inequality
  • insects
  • investments
  • kids
  • law
  • learning
  • legal
  • lifestyle
  • marine conservation
  • marine protection
  • meat
  • mental health
  • mining
  • money
  • nature
  • net zero
  • oceans
  • oil
  • plant-based
  • policy
  • politics
  • pollution
  • recipe
  • refills
  • renewables
  • rivers
  • schools
  • sewage
  • shopping
  • supermarket
  • sustainability
  • tax
  • tips
  • trees
  • urban
  • vegan
  • war
  • waste
  • water
  • weather
  • wellbeing
  • wildlife
  • women
  • work
  • workplace
0 Shares