BY KATIE - MYGREENPOD, 18 Feb '18

Risk posed by microplastics could be greater for land-based creatures than marine life

It’s now widely accepted that microplastics contaminate our oceans and are harmful to coastal and marine habitats. But what effect do fragments of plastic have in ecosystems on dry land?

This question is the subject of a research initiated by the Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) in partnership with Freie Universität Berlin. It reviews previous individual studies on the topic of microplastics in relation to the effect of microplastics on terrestrial ecosystems.

Ecosystems in ‘serious jeopardy’

Anderson Abel de Souza Machado, IGB researcher and study lead, explained that while little research has been carried out in this area, the results to date ‘are concerning’.

‘Fragments of plastic are present practically all over the world and can trigger many kinds of adverse effect’, he said. ‘The previously observed effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on terrestrial ecosystems around the world indicate that these ecosystems may also be in serious jeopardy.’

Over 400 million tonnes of plastic are produced globally each year, and it’s estimated that one-third of all plastic waste ends up in soils or freshwaters.

Most of this plastic disintegrates into particles smaller than five millimetres, referred to as microplastics, and breaks down further into nanoparticles, which are less than 0.1 micrometre in size.

According to the researchers, terrestrial microplastic pollution is much higher than marine microplastic pollution – an estimated four to 23 times more, depending on the environment.

Sewage, for example, is an important factor in the distribution of microplastics. 80-90% of the particles contained in sewage, such as from clothes fibres, persist in the sludge. Sewage sludge is then often applied to fields as fertiliser, meaning that several thousand tonnes of microplastics end up in our soils each year.

Potentially toxic effects

Some microplastics have properties that could cause direct damage to ecosystems. For instance, the surfaces of tiny fragments of plastic may carry disease-causing organisms and act as a vector that transmits diseases in the environment.

Microplastics can also interact with soil fauna, affecting their health and soil functions. Earthworms, for example, make their burrows differently when microplastics are present in the soil, affecting the earthworm’s fitness and the soil condition.

Generally speaking, when plastic particles break down they gain new physical and chemical properties, increasing the risk that they will have a toxic effect on organisms.

And the more likely it is that toxic effects will occur, the larger the number of potentially affected species and ecological functions.

Polyacrylic fibres in soil
Polyacrylic fibres in soil. Photo Anderson Abel de Souza Machado

Chemical effects are especially problematic at the decomposition stage, as spotted by the team of authors led by Anderson Abel de Souza Machado. For example, additives such as phthalates and Bisphenol A leach out of plastic particles. These additives are known for their hormonal effects and can potentially disrupt the hormone system not only of vertebrates, but also of several invertebrates.

Nano-sized particles may also cause inflammation; they may traverse or change cellular barriers, and even cross highly selective membranes such as the blood-brain barrier or the placenta.

Within the cell, they can trigger changes in gene expression and biochemical reactions, among other things. The long-term effects of these changes have not yet been sufficiently explored., but it’s already been shown that when passing the blood-brain barrier nanoplastics have a behaviour-changing effect in fish.

Plastic particles found in foods

Humans also ingest microplastics via food: they have already been detected not only in fish and seafood, but also in salt, sugar and beer. It could be that the accumulation of plastics in terrestrial organisms is already common everywhere, the researchers speculate, even among those that do not ‘ingest’ their food. For example, tiny fragments of plastic can be accumulated in yeasts and filamentous fungi.

The intake and uptake of small microplastics could turn out to be the new long-term stress factor for the environment. At the moment, however, there’s no way to get an accurate assessment of the situation as there isn’t a standardised method for determining microplastics in terrestrial ecosystems. It’s often a difficult and labour-intensive process to detect tiny fragments of plastic particles in soils, for instance.

The new IGB study highlights the importance of reliable, scientifically based data on degradation behaviour and the effects of microplastics. This data is necessary to be able to respond effectively to contamination by microplastics and the risk they pose to terrestrial ecosystems, which is where most plastic waste that enters the environment accumulates.