The Big Smoke
UK banks and investors responsible for nearly double the UK’s annual carbon emissions, report finds
Home » The Big Smoke
Published: 25 May 2021
This Article was Written by: Katie Hill - My Green Pod
A report published today (25 May 2021) by Greenpeace UK and WWF reveals UK banks and asset managers were responsible for financing 805 million tonnes of CO2 in 2019.
To put that into context, if The City of London were a country it would be the ninth biggest emitter of CO2 in the world – ranking higher than Germany.
The new research points towards finance as one of the UK’s biggest contributors to climate change and supports calls for regulation to be introduced across the sector to bring it into line with Paris Agreement targets.
A ‘high carbon sector’
The analysis, carried out by leading climate solutions and project developer South Pole, used market-leading carbon accounting methodology to calculate, for the first time, the carbon emissions associated with the lending and investment activities of the UK’s financial sector, based on an indicative sample.
It found that UK banks and asset managers financed carbon emissions that were 1.8 times the annual net emissions of the UK as a whole.
The findings demonstrate that UK finance should be considered a ‘high carbon sector’, not dissimilar to oil and gas extraction, coal mining, aviation and transport.
‘Trying to set a path to net-zero emissions without tackling the UK financial sector is like sticking a plaster when the patient needs open heart surgery. Despite seeing ambitious commitments to tackle the climate emergency, our finance sector is still driving global investment towards the old, destructive ways of doing business that are destroying our one shared home.
‘The UK financial sector could be the first in the world to be aligned with the Paris Agreement targets – and reap the rewards as global business shifts towards clean, green investments. But it’s clear voluntary pledges aren’t getting the job done. The UK government must show the global leadership expected of the COP26 Presidency and commit to mandating all financial institutions to have net zero transition plans that cover their investments in every corner of the globe.’
WWF UK’s chief executive
Tip of the iceberg
While the findings clearly demonstrate the scale of impact from financial institutions in driving climate change, the report also highlights that this is just the tip of the iceberg.
The analysis used an indicative sample of the UK’s financial institutions – made up of 15 banks and 10 asset managers – and excludes certain financing activities like underwriting.
As a result, the true extent of the carbon emissions funded by the UK’s finance sector is expected to be far greater.
Despite this, UK financial institutions are not currently regulated in the same way as other high carbon sectors. When it comes to cutting emissions, they are not legally required to align their financing activities with the UK’s or global climate commitments.
Instead, some banks and other financial institutions are making voluntary pledges to reduce their carbon emissions, many of which have been exposed as greenwash. Alone they will not deliver the emissions reductions required to successfully tackle climate change.
Funding fossil fuels
According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in order to limit global temperature rises to 1.5°C, global emissions need to fall by 45% from 2010 levels by 2030.
However, since the signing of the Paris Agreement in 2015, the world’s largest 60 banks alone have provided £2.7 trillion ($3.8 trillion) to the fossil fuel industry.
Without legislation that mandates UK banks and investors to develop transition plans that align with the 1.5°C temperature goal of the Paris Agreement, we will fail both to tackle globally financed emissions and to avoid catastrophic climate change.
‘Finance is the UK’s dirty little secret. Banks and investors are responsible for more emissions than most nations and the UK government is giving them a free pass. How can we say we’re ‘leading the world on climate action’ while allowing financial institutions to plough billions into fossil fuel production every year? The claim is almost laughable.
‘As the host of this year’s pivotal global climate summit, the government can no longer turn a blind eye. Rather than relying on self-regulation we need legislation that forces all banks and asset managers to align all financing activities with the goals of the Paris Agreement. That would be genuine climate leadership.’
Greenpeace UK’s executive director
Aligning finance with climate targets
Last month the UK government announced a new target to reduce emissions by 78% by 2035.
However, neither the government nor relevant regulators have taken adequate action to ensure the activities of UK financial institutions are aligned with this target, the net-zero target or the goals of the Paris Agreement.
‘UK financial institutions need to stop financing capex that will result in carbon lock-in and stranded assets. There is a huge opportunity to help clients rapidly transition towards net zero carbon and nature positive. UK institutions providing financial products and services globally can make a massive contribution to solving the problem and there is no time to lose.’
DR BEN CALDECOTT
Director of the Oxford Sustainable Finance Programme and the UK Centre for Greening Finance & Investment
Greenpeace UK and WWF are calling for legislation that requires all UK regulated financial institutions to adopt and implement a transition plan that is in keeping with the goal of limiting global temperature rises to 1.5°C.
The UK government should announce this ahead of the UK hosted global climate summit, COP26, and must use its presidency of both COP26 and the G7 summits to encourage other countries to adopt the same approach.
Last week the well respected International Energy Agency (IEA), whose energy forecasts are often cited by financial actors as well as governments, concluded that to reach net zero by 2050 no new oil and gas development must take place.
Based on this, financial institutions with similar commitments to net-zero and stakes in oil and gas must push the sector not to explore for more fossil fuels.